Supreme Court

    RECENT RULINGS

      ON THE DOCKET

        Alignment is each justice's general judicial philosophy as commonly described, not a party. Justices don't belong to parties, and they don't always vote with their bloc.

        No. 24-482 · October Term 2025

        Ellingburg v. United States

        Decided January 20, 2026, 9–0 · From the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

        Question

        Is criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause?

        Facts of the case

        In December 1995, Holsey Ellingburg, Jr. robbed a bank and was indicted in April 1996. He was convicted in August 1996 and sentenced to prison, along with an order to pay over $7,500 in restitution under the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA). Following his release from prison in June 2022, having paid only about one-quarter of the original restitution amount, Mr. Ellingburg filed a motion arguing that enforcement of his restitution order was unlawful. He claimed that the applicable 20-year payment period under the VWPA had expired and that applying a longer restitution term and mandatory interest provision under the later-enacted Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. The district court rejected Mr. Ellingburg’s arguments and upheld the restitution order. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision.

        From Oyez.

        The Court's vote 9–0

        Majority: Brett M. Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Neil M. Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Samuel A. Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson